# A Competitive Economic Framework for MultiversX: Toward Revenue and Reflexive Value Accrual

**URL:** <https://agora.multiversx.com/t/a-competitive-economic-framework-for-multiversx-toward-revenue-and-reflexive-value-accrual/530>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [October 3, 2025, 1:22pm UTC](https://agora.multiversx.com/t/a-competitive-economic-framework-for-multiversx-toward-revenue-and-reflexive-value-accrual/530 "2025-10-03T13:22:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gdad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b4bc9f/32.png) [@gdad](https://agora.multiversx.com/u/gdad)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2025, 5:27pm UTC](https://agora.multiversx.com/t/a-competitive-economic-framework-for-multiversx-toward-revenue-and-reflexive-value-accrual/530/14 "2025-10-05T17:27:40Z")

</div>

The Growth Dividend for Users brings more unnecessary complication. I get there is a wish to increase chain activity but this should not have any link to a new economic proposal. If defi apps themselves cannot attract usage then its down to them. Its already confusing enough for new participants to navigate blockchain ecosystems as it is without adding more curveballs. This saves you 20% of that portion of inflation. Keep staking simple

---

_[View the full topic](https://agora.multiversx.com/t/a-competitive-economic-framework-for-multiversx-toward-revenue-and-reflexive-value-accrual/530)._